In recent years, modular construction has gained significant traction in the building industry. However, despite its growing popularity and evident advantages, many myths and misconceptions persist. For developers and manufacturers considering this innovative approach, it's crucial to separate fact from fiction. In this article, we explore and debunk some of the most common myths about modular construction. 

Background 

Fleetwood Australia has been in the construction industry since 1964 and has evolved from manufacturing caravan parts to becoming a leader in modular construction. They focus on providing innovative building solutions across various sectors, including education, social housing, and remote accommodation.  

Modular construction has emerged as a game-changer in the construction industry, where innovation and efficiency take center stage. Among the various methodologies, the choice between volumetric vs panelized approaches has gained prominence, with each offering unique advantages. This article explores the differences between volumetric and panelized construction for both developers and manufacturers. 

Introduction 

In the progressive realm of US residential construction, staying ahead of the curve is crucial for achieving success. One key methodology gaining traction in the industry is Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DFMA). DFMA is a strategic approach that optimizes the design process to enhance efficiency in manufacturing and assembly, ultimately leading to cost savings, faster construction timelines and standardization. In this article, we'll dig into the principles of DFMA and explore how residential developers can leverage this methodology to their advantage. 

Introduction  

Residential developers are always looking for new ways to simplify the construction process. Offsite construction, prefabrication and modular construction are often considered.  

While they may seem interchangeable at first glance there are subtleties between them. This article aims to provide a clear understanding of these differences and how each method can contribute to the future of US residential construction.